Quote:
Originally Posted by Dark Shikari
I mean the standard output. That you see on your screen.
x264 has no way of knowing what form your input is in.Yes, interlaced encoding and decoding is slower.
|
So if actually wanted to de-interlace I should do it in the avisynth script before passing the frame to x264?
OK - took a bit of time. Here is the x264 log
C:\x264>start /belownormal /b /w x264.exe --threads 0 --8x8dct --bitrate 4500 --level 4.1 --bframes 1 --b-rdo --weightb --direct none --subme 6 --trellis
1 --analyse p8x8,b8x8,i4x4,p4x4 --me hex --interlace --thread-input --progress --no-psnr --no-ssim --output ncis-2.264 ncis.avs
avis [info]: 1920x1080 @ 25.00 fps (417 frames)
x264 [info]: using cpu capabilities: MMX MMXEXT SSE SSE2 SSE3 3DNow!
x264 [info]: slice I:12 Avg QP:16.50 size:113114:00
x264 [info]: slice P:385 Avg QP:21.48 size: 21643
x264 [info]: slice B:20 Avg QP:25.00 size: 7860
x264 [info]: mb I I16..4: 51.3% 36.7% 12.0%
x264 [info]: mb P I16..4: 27.0% 0.0% 2.6% P16..4: 29.7% 3.7% 0.4% 0.0% 0
.0% skip:36.6%
x264 [info]: mb B I16..4: 2.8% 0.0% 0.2% B16..8: 95.9% 0.5% 0.6% direct:
0.0% skip: 0.0%
x264 [info]: final ratefactor: 22.35
x264 [info]: 8x8 transform intra:3.5% inter:77.5%
x264 [info]: kb/s:4722.8
encoded 417 frames, 1.71 fps, 4723.83 kb/s
Here is an image captured from the playback of that conversion
Thanks
Larry