View Single Post
Old 25th January 2013, 04:15   #1419  |  Link
Guest
Guest
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 21,901
Well, schweinsz, with all due respect, nothing changed in DGAVCDecDI and then one day things stopped working with one of your new releases. We've discussed this but you were not interested in resolving it, just kept saying nothing changed. This is why I had to stop my development.

Don't you recall writing this to me:

"I notice the same problem; perhaps it is because that I change some compiler options of the DiAVC."

What ticked me off is that you just started releasing versions that you knew broke backward compatibility without discussing it with me or informing me. That told me you didn't care about DGAVCDecDI. So why should I care about DiAVC? I thought we had a good partnership going and that we could do great things together. Then you started not caring, and I suppose it is because you moved on to your new encoder.

Quote:
but I still maintain the DiAVC project
Then you can release a latest version that is compatible with DGAVCDecDI just as version 1.2.2 was? If not, then what does "maintain" actually mean to you?

Last edited by Guest; 25th January 2013 at 04:58.
Guest is offline   Reply With Quote