Doom9's Forum - View Single Post

kolak · 22nd September 2015, 12:04

It's not about liking interlaced or not, but be able to deliver "NTSC" friendly masters from 25p sources.

I don't like interlaced at all, but try to create high quality 23.976p, 29.97p master from 25p source (without speed change!) with motion adaptive technique. Not a single solution can do it at acceptable level for a random source, that why people use 60i.
There is a huge need for it in a real world! It's for broadcast, which is crap quality anyway. The problem is that motion adaptive artefacts are visible, where a bit jerky video is more acceptable.

22nd September 2015, 12:04	#29 \| Link
kolak Registered User Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Poland Posts: 2,843	It's not about liking interlaced or not, but be able to deliver "NTSC" friendly masters from 25p sources. I don't like interlaced at all, but try to create high quality 23.976p, 29.97p master from 25p source (without speed change!) with motion adaptive technique. Not a single solution can do it at acceptable level for a random source, that why people use 60i. There is a huge need for it in a real world! It's for broadcast, which is crap quality anyway. The problem is that motion adaptive artefacts are visible, where a bit jerky video is more acceptable. Last edited by kolak; 22nd September 2015 at 12:15.