View Single Post
Old 12th November 2012, 18:55   #6  |  Link
martin53
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 407
Quote:
Originally Posted by lisztfr9 View Post
@martin53

With weight i was meaning the size in kb.

In your second § also i fear there is a contradiction with subject luma, which is ignored, but finally outputted... ?
Size means little compresssibility. That is not what I use.

The average luma of the original picture says nothing about the amount of detail in it. After applying a function that makes pixels at edges bright, and pixels in even areas dark (basically any edge detection), the picture will be brighter if there are more edges.
Now, the runtime function AverageLuma() will return a measure for the amount of edges in the original picture.
Got it?
martin53 is offline   Reply With Quote