Quote:
Originally Posted by 2Bdecided
If it's mixed and non-separable, it sounds lost to me! I get what you're trying to say, but I'm not convinced.
|
temporal and spatial data are already highly interdependent and non separable, I was just saying that the change is non-ideally reversible.
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2Bdecided
Not really. If you're panning past a vertical thing (e.g. a pole, a window, whatever) a slower shutter just makes that "thing" blur, i.e. it looks wider. Whereas the rolling shutter means it's not vertical! It's the same amount "not vertical" (i.e. it's the same angle) whatever the shutter speed.
|
The primary reason a slower shutter should help is that it should allow motion compensation to work more optimally. slower shutter speeds should also greatly reduce the severity of "tearing" caused by flashing lights etc. Basically the slower shutter speed should ensure that just about everything left over should be almost entirely recoverable.