I don't see a contradiction to myself here. I think that these quotes still enhance the statements of my first post in this thread.
Also it is not a personal attack as I said many times in past, too.
If you are interpreting my answers as personal attacks it is your problem. Not mine!
Quote:
traditional mixing with 180° :: what the traditional means? your myths?, your Gods' words?
|
The wikipedia style of matrix. The Besweet style of matrix. The AC3filter style of matrix. The ffdshow style of matrix. Is this enough traditional style?
Quote:
inverse mixing with 90° : youself admitted you have no clear picture of the DPL II model already?
|
Of course not, as I already did some manual mixes myself, build some active Dolby surround mixing ciruits etc.
If you should find irony in the last sentence, keep it for yourself. Thanks.
Actually I think you are the person that is not able or willing to do a objective conversation without personal attacks.
I never did attack you. But you do!