Doom9's Forum - View Single Post - KNLMeansCL: OpenCL NLMeans de-noising algorithm [2018-01-29]

ShogoXT · 10th December 2016, 07:29

Fiddling around with it in Staxrip I found a few things.

With default settings and with d=0 (Temp on or off made no difference), there was significant blurring compared to the older 7.7 version.

See here:
http://screenshotcomparison.com/comp...3278/picture:0
Its two sets, first is with 1.0b1 vs 7.7, and second with 1.0b1 vs OFF.

Keep in mind this is after it was upsampled and sharpened (awarpsharp2 and LSFMod) a good bit, so the blurring is actually a bit worse before probably (I cant take a pic without LSFMod because id have to redo how havfunc is loaded to make NNedi3 work)

Also with channels = "YUV", although Staxrip doesnt complain, it makes the preview window only show this:
http://imgur.com/mmjCT8e

EDIT: Tried setting all the basic values to 1, but no effect on reducing blur (a,s, and h. Did d as well to play with it)

10th December 2016, 07:29	#1003 \| Link
ShogoXT Registered User Join Date: Dec 2011 Posts: 95	Fiddling around with it in Staxrip I found a few things. With default settings and with d=0 (Temp on or off made no difference), there was significant blurring compared to the older 7.7 version. See here: http://screenshotcomparison.com/comp...3278/picture:0 Its two sets, first is with 1.0b1 vs 7.7, and second with 1.0b1 vs OFF. Keep in mind this is after it was upsampled and sharpened (awarpsharp2 and LSFMod) a good bit, so the blurring is actually a bit worse before probably (I cant take a pic without LSFMod because id have to redo how havfunc is loaded to make NNedi3 work) Also with channels = "YUV", although Staxrip doesnt complain, it makes the preview window only show this: http://imgur.com/mmjCT8e EDIT: Tried setting all the basic values to 1, but no effect on reducing blur (a,s, and h. Did d as well to play with it) Last edited by ShogoXT; 10th December 2016 at 20:22.