View Single Post
Old 4th September 2010, 15:50   #92  |  Link
Guest
Guest
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 21,901
I clarified in my first post in this thread:

Quote:
*** EDIT: As seen below, the FFMPEG project is *not* in violation, to the extent that they do not supply binaries, because source code is not a "product". I am sorry for my incorrect statement about this (which originated from a not fully clear phone conversation with MPEGLA), and for any confusion/bad feelings it may have engendered. ***
After further consideration, since my original post, though arising from a miscommunication with MPEGLA and not any malicious intent, was the trigger for the ensuing discussion that got out of hand, I've asked Doom9 to rescind all the ensuing strikes, regardless of actual rule violations that occurred.
Guest is offline   Reply With Quote