Oh this is just a ridiculous thread. And Outpinged (sp) hit it on the head when he pointed out that the guy who claimed his values were "ultimate" provided no less than 5 different so-called "ultimate" values... each one more "ultimate" than the other (?). And his credibility went down the drain when he started defending the use of BlendFields() over FieldDeinterlace().
Of course there are certain scenes that IVTC 2.2 handled perfectly, where Decomb 4.01 (haven't tried 4.05 yet) failed on. However I think it is the EXCEPTION and not the NORM for IVTC 2.2 to suceed where Decomb 4.01 fails! So please get your toolset up-to-date, and teach yourself all of the various options for Decomb (and try them) before going out in a public forum and blathering nonsense about how you have found 5 different "ultimate" IVTC settings (!) for an IVTC plugin that hasn't been developed in a year or more!
|