View Single Post
Old 24th May 2013, 18:03   #18862  |  Link
petran79
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 87
Quote:
Originally Posted by leeperry View Post
"lower in quality"

Is the refresh rate properly detected? Is the problem still there with the old rendering path?

Anyway, thanks for the feedback as you are the second person mentioning that 660's are unusable with mVR on XP and I was just about to order one.....I guess I'll have to find the motivation to install and thorougly testbed W7/W8 before ordering a new GPU, bummer....but apparently W8 comes with its own bag of new problems, m$ doesn't want to release W7 SP2(critical hotfixes were released for audio & USB since SP1) and madshi might very well not care all that much about XP anymore. Oh well, don't fix it if it's ain't broken and I'll be saving money in the process too I guess ^^


.
by lower quality I mean if it is encoded in XVID or DIVX that is lower in resources. If its in H264, problem is more likely to occur.

But you have to forget about MadVR Jinc algorithm. Video are totally useless with dropped frames.
petran79 is offline   Reply With Quote