Quote:
Originally Posted by LoRd_MuldeR
I don't see how this would be useful...
|
Fast x264 settings run faster with x86 x264. Including fast first passes which I see are ~5-10% faster. For example:
1280x720, preset medium, 2000 kbps, windows 7 x64, athlon ii 620
x86 from command line
pass 1: encoded 1277 frames, 48.40 fps, 1970.02 kb/s
pass 2: encoded 1277 frames, 28.44 fps, 2000.92 kb/s
x64 launcher
[First Pass]
encoded 1277 frames, 45.61 fps, 1969.83 kb/s
[Second Pass]
encoded 1277 frames, 29.02 fps, 2000.89 kb/s
Also I did a benchmark with the same CPU/source.
Preset: Ultrafast
Tuning: None
Profile: High
Params:
[Type: 32-Bit, Pipe Buffer Size: 0 MByte]
encoded 1277 frames, 51.93 fps, 1083.92 kb/s
encoded 1277 frames, 52.19 fps, 1083.92 kb/s
encoded 1277 frames, 51.82 fps, 1083.92 kb/s
[Type: 64-Bit, Pipe Buffer Size: 0 MByte]
encoded 1277 frames, 47.30 fps, 1083.92 kb/s
encoded 1277 frames, 45.61 fps, 1083.92 kb/s
encoded 1277 frames, 47.30 fps, 1083.92 kb/s
[Type: 64-Bit, Pipe Buffer Size: 1 MByte]
encoded 1277 frames, 47.30 fps, 1083.92 kb/s
encoded 1277 frames, 47.30 fps, 1083.92 kb/s
encoded 1277 frames, 47.30 fps, 1083.92 kb/s
[Type: 64-Bit, Pipe Buffer Size: 2 MByte]
encoded 1277 frames, 47.30 fps, 1083.92 kb/s
encoded 1277 frames, 47.30 fps, 1083.92 kb/s
encoded 1277 frames, 47.30 fps, 1083.92 kb/s
[Type: 64-Bit, Pipe Buffer Size: 4 MByte]
encoded 1277 frames, 47.30 fps, 1083.92 kb/s
encoded 1277 frames, 47.30 fps, 1083.92 kb/s
encoded 1277 frames, 45.61 fps, 1083.92 kb/s
[Type: 64-Bit, Pipe Buffer Size: 8 MByte]
encoded 1277 frames, 45.61 fps, 1083.92 kb/s
encoded 1277 frames, 47.30 fps, 1083.92 kb/s
encoded 1277 frames, 47.30 fps, 1083.92 kb/s
Quote:
No need to use an external tool. As I have created the process(es), I already have the handles to suspend/resume them directly.
And if you click the "X" button, the encoding will be paused. Click "No" to resume...
|
Thanks that works.