Doom9's Forum - View Single Post

Revgen · 18th November 2005, 23:26

@Hank315

Thanks for the new version.

However, there is one problem that I ecountered.

I encoded my file at 2300KBPS with AVAMAT7 and it turned out looking great. But it also turned out slightly undersized. So I ran it through Bitrateviewer and it reported that the file was 2153KBPS. Thats about a 7% decrease in quality.

Could this be the fault of AVAMAT7? If so, what would be a better matrix to use.

Here are my settings:

HC16 -i mysource -o myvideo -b 2300 maxbitrate 9000 -profile best -aspectratio 4:3 -scene -nointerlace -matrix avamat7

The source is about 600-700 MB's, so I could upload it to www.yousendit.com and e-mail the link to you. PM your address if your interested.

Thanks.

EDIT
My Source is also B&W. Could the lack of chroma affect how HCEnc calculates bitrate?

18th November 2005, 23:26	#55 \| Link
Revgen Registered User Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: Near LA, California, USA Posts: 1,545	@Hank315 Thanks for the new version. However, there is one problem that I ecountered. I encoded my file at 2300KBPS with AVAMAT7 and it turned out looking great. But it also turned out slightly undersized. So I ran it through Bitrateviewer and it reported that the file was 2153KBPS. Thats about a 7% decrease in quality. Could this be the fault of AVAMAT7? If so, what would be a better matrix to use. Here are my settings: HC16 -i mysource -o myvideo -b 2300 maxbitrate 9000 -profile best -aspectratio 4:3 -scene -nointerlace -matrix avamat7 The source is about 600-700 MB's, so I could upload it to www.yousendit.com and e-mail the link to you. PM your address if your interested. Thanks. EDIT My Source is also B&W. Could the lack of chroma affect how HCEnc calculates bitrate? Last edited by Revgen; 18th November 2005 at 23:32.