Quote:
Originally Posted by LigH
Only if you prefer to look at absolute differences, instead of relative ratios. And to be frank, I see no reason to prefer absolute differences over relative ratios.
With the exception of the extremes, the relative ratios of the encoding speeds of most presets were almost constant (and the differences among these ratios most probably in a range of random influences, like interrupting kernel tasks).
At least, there is a certain advantage of the MSVC builds. Rather small yet reliable. |
Thanks for making that table re-cycling the data I pasted a few days ago, glad it served a purpose.
Although it is missing the placebo preset.
I just can't be bothered waiting 45 minutes to run each placebo encodes.
Also note it is important to remind you these tests were ran using 2.3+23, it is worth mentioning the latest commit applies limit-tu to slower, veryslow presets for an up to 20% increase in FPS according to the commit, this most likely has skewed the presented data here, it has to be seen whether the delta remains and even there we're talking about 0.15 of 1 fps.
