View Single Post
Old 12th May 2012, 21:18   #13  |  Link
IgorC
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,315
Quote:
Originally Posted by Asmodian View Post
Does that apply to higher bit-rates? At >140kbps stereo I have been unable to tell them apart myself and I have not found a review or comparison where they used bit rates I would consider using.
Those are results for 100 kbps
http://listening-tests.hydrogenaudio...96-a/index.htm

When it comes to higher bitrate it's personal and depends of a lot factors.
There are pretty old public tests.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Codec_listening_test

Yes, they're old but Apple encoder was always the best encoder in those AAC tests. And the last public AAC test also prooves it's true at 100 kbps.


There is also a good tester Kamedo2. He has tested AAC encoders http://d.hatena.ne.jp/kamedo2/20111029/1319840519

qaac is Apple AAC.
IgorC is offline   Reply With Quote