View Single Post
Old 23rd January 2017, 11:36   #4  |  Link
tebasuna51
Moderator
 
tebasuna51's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Spain
Posts: 6,915
Quote:
Originally Posted by manolito View Post
Sorry for the Off Topic post, but are there any listening tests which support this statement? Using standard bitrates (96 kbps per channel) and above can you really hear a difference between the latest Aften and FFmpeg?
Don't exist listening tests between Aften and ffmpeg, also don't exist between free encoders and certified DD encoders.
But I know at least 3 differences between Aften and ffmpeg:

1) Channel coupling:

Justin Ruggles say :
Quote:
So far the only significant difference I've found between the Aften output and the DD output is channel coupling. The bandwidth reported for DD is the upper end of the coupling range. Aften does not support channel coupling yet.
The ffmpeg encoder, developed with Justin Ruggles support, have channel coupling.

Maybe for that the cutoff frecuency is improved (you can check a Aften encode and a ffmpeg encode at same bitrate and the last one support more bandwith).

2) Stereo encode bug.

Aften have a little bug and mix the two channels (reported by me in Aften thread). The output FL have traces from FR input and viceversa. At very low volume but exist.

Bug solved in ffmpeg.

3) Some audio hardware can't decode properly Aften encodes.

Problem solved recoding to AC3 with ffmpeg.
__________________
BeHappy, AviSynth audio transcoder.
tebasuna51 is offline   Reply With Quote