Quote:
Originally Posted by iwod
i wont classify it as poor ( yet ), it is only x264 is so good.
|
Just because something is good, doesn't mean the other isn't poor.
Quote:
Originally Posted by iwod
Which encodes at 1000+ fps...
|
Code:
x264 --preset ultrafast --crf 40 -o h:\test.mkv h:\test.avi
ffms [info]: 640x360p 1:1 @ 30000/1001 fps (vfr)
x264 [info]: using SAR=1/1
x264 [info]: using cpu capabilities: MMX2 SSE2Fast SSSE3 Cache64
x264 [info]: profile Baseline, level 3.0
x264 [info]: frame I:29 Avg QP:38.00 size: 6631
x264 [info]: frame P:7032 Avg QP:41.15 size: 833
x264 [info]: mb I I16..4: 100.0% 0.0% 0.0%
x264 [info]: mb P I16..4: 8.9% 0.0% 0.0% P16..4: 17.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% skip:73.5%
x264 [info]: coded y,uvDC,uvAC intra: 10.7% 33.3% 8.0% inter: 2.8% 4.5% 0.2%
x264 [info]: i16 v,h,dc,p: 36% 28% 23% 12%
x264 [info]: i8c dc,h,v,p: 67% 16% 14% 3%
x264 [info]: kb/s:205.43
aborted at input frame 7067, output frame 7061
encoded 7061 frames, 606.77 fps, 205.48 kb/s
Q6600 @ 3.2
If I was to drop the resolution abit more and clock it @3.6, I reckon I could hit 1000fps too.
