[ney2x]

I compare CoreAVC 3.0 to LAV CUVID 0.12, the result is this.

LAV CUVID 0.12
VPU Load = 33%
GPU Load = 12%
Memory Load = 721MB/1024MB
CPU Load = Average 14%

CoreAVC 3.0
VPU Load = 32%
GPU Load = 11%
Memory Load = 738MB/1024MB
CPU Load = Average 20%

*LAV Video 0.35
VPU Load = 0%
GPU Load = 38%
Memory Load = 332MB/1024MB
CPU Load = 30%

I used GPU Observer Gadget (I think it's the same as GPU-Z) to measure the loads. Filters used : LAV Filters 0.35, Reclock, madVR 0.74, MPC-HC. I don't know who is the real winner here but my observation is, faster seeking with LAV CUVID.

Is LAV Video a software decoder like ffdshow? Additionally, I got no glitches in madvr using LAV Video wherein CoreAVC and LAV CUVID I get 5-8 glitches, I'm using the default settings of madvr.