View Single Post
Old 29th November 2005, 09:26   #16  |  Link
Didée
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Germany
Posts: 5,391
In your first post, you talked about a "good quality source". Now you're always talking about artefacts that have to be reduced. Could you please decide what's the real deal?

The following script loads and uses Spresso correctly. Get the plugins, adapt the pathnames, and it'll work:

Code:
LoadPlugin("X:\path\to\MaskTools.dll")
LoadPlugin("X:\path\to\RemoveGrain.dll")

Import("Y:\path\to\SPresso.avs")

XYZSource("Z:\path\to\YourSource")

SPresso()
The filtering chain you currently have gives a rather blurry output for sure. One should look into what the problem is with the actual source, and do specific filtering. Better then to produce this kind of universal mush.

BTW, you'll have no fun with a framesize of 800*450. You should resize to 800*448.
(And in case you like mush, write "BicubicResize(800,448,1,0)" -- no more artefacts...)


edit:

BTW2, I once put the "Dust" filter package online here. Those who are afraid of Dust's potential blocking artefacts might want to use PixieDustPP instead.
__________________
- We´re at the beginning of the end of mankind´s childhood -

My little flickr gallery. (Yes indeed, I do have hobbies other than digital video!)

Last edited by Didée; 29th November 2005 at 09:42.
Didée is offline   Reply With Quote