View Single Post
Old 7th December 2017, 10:03   #18  |  Link
monohouse
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 106
I just had another look at the output of daa3, you are right, it does add noise, but plain and simple needi3 looks better than tfm, unlike tfm it doesn't miss some of the interlacing, this explains whay I needed to use such high noise reduction settings, without the noise that is added from daa3 I can cut the noise reduction quantity by half and might as well set twopass to false, this will double the rendering framerate and at the same time increase the quality

I tried to modify the daa3 code and remove the sharpening stage from it:
Code:
    shrpD   = mt_makediff(dbl,dbl,U=3,V=3)
I think it worked good, but now when comparing to nnedi3, needi3 looks like it preserves many details that daa3 removes
with the reduced noise reduction requirements I set to twopass=false and reduced more the temporal radius to 1, even with the optimistic settings I am using it went up from 0.00/0.01 fps to 0.60 fps, 60 times more speed

Last edited by monohouse; 8th December 2017 at 07:56.
monohouse is offline   Reply With Quote