Doom9's Forum - View Single Post

Chainmax · 14th June 2009, 20:50

Thanks for a new release of such a great plugin, tritical

From examining the comparison pics, nnedi2 v2 looks a wee bit softer and with far less artifacts (if any) than nnedi v1.3. The white fences and house walls in the second lighthouse comparison are a really good indicator of the lack of artifacting, it's pretty amazing.

I especially like that now nnediresize2x.avs is no longer needed and we can simply use nnedi2_rpow2(qual=3,rfactor=2,cshift="spline36resize") instead. By the way, how does the resizer choice affect the output of the cshift parameter?

One thing, though: there were some cases (I think they were with animated content, not sure though) where EEDI2 would yield better results than NNEDI v1.3. Would it be possible for you to incluse EEDI2 in that comparison?

14th June 2009, 20:50	#26 \| Link
Chainmax Huh? Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: Uruguay Posts: 3,103	Thanks for a new release of such a great plugin, tritical From examining the comparison pics, nnedi2 v2 looks a wee bit softer and with far less artifacts (if any) than nnedi v1.3. The white fences and house walls in the second lighthouse comparison are a really good indicator of the lack of artifacting, it's pretty amazing. I especially like that now nnediresize2x.avs is no longer needed and we can simply use nnedi2_rpow2(qual=3,rfactor=2,cshift="spline36resize") instead. By the way, how does the resizer choice affect the output of the cshift parameter? One thing, though: there were some cases (I think they were with animated content, not sure though) where EEDI2 would yield better results than NNEDI v1.3. Would it be possible for you to incluse EEDI2 in that comparison? __________________ Read Decomb's readmes and tutorials, the IVTC tutorial and the capture guide in order to learn about combing and how to deal with it.