View Single Post
Old 24th December 2008, 19:53   #4  |  Link
Dark Shikari
x264 developer
 
Dark Shikari's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 8,666
It seems odd that the only encoding option exposed directly to the user--of all options--is trellis, despite it being one of the rather less important options both quality or speed-wise...

Quote:
x264 - core 65 r1057 5f8a149 - H.264/MPEG-4 AVC codec - Copyleft 2003-2008 - htt
p://www.videolan.org/x264.html - options: cabac=1 ref=1 deblock=1:0:0 analyse=0x
1:0x111 me=hex subme=6 psy_rd=1.0:0.0 mixed_ref=0 me_range=16 chroma_me=1 trelli
s=0 8x8dct=0 cqm=0 deadzone=21,11 chroma_qp_offset=-2 threads=3 nr=0 decimate=1
mbaff=0 bframes=3 b_pyramid=0 b_adapt=1 b_bias=0 direct=1 wpredb=0 keyint=24 key
int_min=1 scenecut=40(pre) rc=crf crf=28.0 qcomp=0.60 qpmin=10 qpmax=51 qpstep=4
vbv_maxrate=17500 vbv_bufsize=14500 ip_ratio=1.40 pb_ratio=1.30 aq=1:1.00
Oh dear... you could at least enable 8x8dct you know... or is this intended to be a first-pass? Also, CRF 28? That's rather low quality... and for a target-filesize encode (e.g. BD-9), shouldn't you be using bitrate mode?

Last edited by Dark Shikari; 24th December 2008 at 20:17.
Dark Shikari is offline   Reply With Quote