Doom9's Forum - View Single Post

MysteryX · 2nd July 2016, 14:08

I've been doing some comparison between Deshaker and Mercalli ProDad v4. I wanted to share my results.

First, Deshaker is a VirtualDub plugin and is hard to use. I'm trying to program it within my own software to automate the process but am encountering a few challenges.

Mercalli ProDad is a commercial software. It used to integrate within Adobe Premiere but v3 and v4 are stand-alone software.

So here are the results, for those interested.

Deshaker
Pros:
- Cleaner image
- Better efforts at reconstructing borders and not zooming unecessarily
Cons:
- Difficult to configure and use
- Slow
- Some wobble or jello effects

Mercalli ProDad
Pros:
- Much easier to use
- Much faster
- Wobble and jello effects are still there but weaker
Cons:
- Image is blurrier
- It zooms a lot more
- Requires a lossy re-encoding of the file -- not ideal in a video processing chain

I am aware that some of the settings can be tweaked in both software to improve the results. Here I have gone mostly with default settings with just minor customization.

I would have expected Mercalli ProDad to do a much better job because it analyzes the movements in 3D and is a lot more sophisticated.

Overall, Deshaker wins. It will be worth spending more time to program its easy integration within an AviSynth script.

However, whenever I use "fill borders with previous or future frames", it fails to render the video. First the video processes, then the output jams on a frame, and after being jammed on the same frame for a while, it aborts the encoding. Will have to investigate.

There was a bug in AviSynth+ where it crashed in the destructor and I fixed it. You need this updated VDubFilter.dll.

I'll have to keep testing whether the issues I'm seeing are related to AviSynth+ or I'm doing something wrong.

2nd July 2016, 14:08	#1 \| Link
MysteryX Soul Architect Join Date: Apr 2014 Posts: 2,559	Deshaker Comparison I've been doing some comparison between Deshaker and Mercalli ProDad v4. I wanted to share my results. First, Deshaker is a VirtualDub plugin and is hard to use. I'm trying to program it within my own software to automate the process but am encountering a few challenges. Mercalli ProDad is a commercial software. It used to integrate within Adobe Premiere but v3 and v4 are stand-alone software. So here are the results, for those interested. Deshaker Pros: - Cleaner image - Better efforts at reconstructing borders and not zooming unecessarily Cons: - Difficult to configure and use - Slow - Some wobble or jello effects Mercalli ProDad Pros: - Much easier to use - Much faster - Wobble and jello effects are still there but weaker Cons: - Image is blurrier - It zooms a lot more - Requires a lossy re-encoding of the file -- not ideal in a video processing chain I am aware that some of the settings can be tweaked in both software to improve the results. Here I have gone mostly with default settings with just minor customization. I would have expected Mercalli ProDad to do a much better job because it analyzes the movements in 3D and is a lot more sophisticated. Overall, Deshaker wins. It will be worth spending more time to program its easy integration within an AviSynth script. However, whenever I use "fill borders with previous or future frames", it fails to render the video. First the video processes, then the output jams on a frame, and after being jammed on the same frame for a while, it aborts the encoding. Will have to investigate. There was a bug in AviSynth+ where it crashed in the destructor and I fixed it. You need this updated VDubFilter.dll. I'll have to keep testing whether the issues I'm seeing are related to AviSynth+ or I'm doing something wrong. __________________ FrameRateConverter \| AvisynthShader \| AvsFilterNet \| Natural Grounding Player with Yin Media Encoder, 432hz Player, Powerliminals Player and Audio Video Muxer Last edited by MysteryX; 2nd July 2016 at 14:17.