View Single Post
Old 2nd September 2003, 19:12   #10  |  Link
SeeMoreDigital
Life's clearer in 4K UHD
 
SeeMoreDigital's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Notts, UK
Posts: 12,227
There's are many 'trade off' decisions you may have to make when capturing.

Capturing 4:3 images is not so bad. But things can get a little awkward when trying to capture 16:9 images.

As you know, an NTSC 1.77:1 (16:9) image viewed on a 16:9 TV, actually starts it's life as an 1.50:1 image. So in order for the image to perfectly fit a 16:9 TV it has to be (horizonally) anamorphicly stretched, by around 20%.

PAL 1.77:1 (16:9) images start their life as just an 1.25:1 image. So in order for this image to perfectly fit a 16:9 TV it has to be (horizonally) anamorphicly stretched, by over 40%!

So as you can see the PAL image has to be stretched twice as much as the NTSC image!

Never the less, some people may find it interesting to conduct their own 'horizontal pixel' stretch tests. Just to see how far they can put up with a streched pixel before they can't take it anymore!

352 pixels is about enough for me!

Cheers
__________________
| I've been testing hardware media playback devices and software A/V encoders and decoders since 2001 | My Network Layout & A/V Gear |

Last edited by SeeMoreDigital; 2nd September 2003 at 19:14.
SeeMoreDigital is offline   Reply With Quote