View Single Post
Old 24th August 2008, 19:49   #9  |  Link
gioowe
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 95
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oopho2ei View Post
I am guessing he means that because bd+ enforces a certain memory footprint (e.g. keys, video etc have to be at a certain fix virtual memory address) he can use a memory dump of the virtual machine interpreter and include it in anydvd as precompiled code module. He would only have to make sure the remaining data vm opcode/keys/video content is at the correct address.
I don't think that. Or you can never create new hardware players or software players that can decode the first released BD+ disks. And if e.g. each certain data has to be at a specific location for all known and future player then there's no point. That's not a footprint.
gioowe is offline   Reply With Quote