View Single Post
Old 26th April 2007, 10:03   #33  |  Link
sysKin
Registered User
 
sysKin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Adelaide, Australia
Posts: 1,167
Whoa plugh what a great work.

Yes -64 is valid. So we were nicely reading r_mvtab[-1]? Great, I wonder why memory access analysis tools didn't pick it up

I suppose I should stick this d_mv_bits() after motion vector writing code and assert that calculated length is the actual bitstream length. This will make us 100% sure nothing else is wrong.

Although, then again, I did have such assertion for a whole macroblock (part of VHQ debugging). I suppose vectors of -64 were never chosen (as they appeared to be horribly costly, 44 kilobits!) and therefore assertion was never hit.
__________________
Visit #xvid or #x264 at irc.freenode.net
sysKin is offline   Reply With Quote