View Single Post
Old 5th October 2004, 18:35   #12  |  Link
olavitur
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 9
Quote:
Originally posted by Sharktooth
I've spent a lot of time for "internal" tests and I'm really happy to receive some positive feedback.
There is also an "experimental" version of EQM V3EHR for insanely high bitrates (6000+) or Q2 encodings.
If you have some free time i suggest you to try EHR too.
Have a nice day and thanks again for the feedback.
Thanks, but no thanks... I'm not that insane
I think your EQM V3UHR is good enough for most of us high quality freaks. Not many of us wants to encode xvid clips which are the same size as original dvd...

I managed to do some comparing between V3UHR and Semi-Insane (SI). This time it was really tough to find any real differences between these two matrixes as they produced about equal picture quality. But it seemes that V3UHR handles noisy parts of the movie a little bit better than SI does. With SI when there was panning in the video noise tend to float on the screen a little. With V3UHR I didn't notice this so much. Maybe SI works better on movies that have minimal amount of noise.
olavitur is offline   Reply With Quote