Quote:
Originally Posted by deathlord
Sorry, I don't see how you conclude this.
|
By looking at the pictures,
and by not misunderstanding the text below:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Midzuki
Just for the record, these are the only "7.1 DTS channel layouts" which are compatible with the Wave-Format-Extensible definitions:
Code:
L, R, C, LFE, Ls, Rs, Lw, Rw
L, R, C, LFE, Ls, Rs, Cs, Ch
(Cs == Back Center, Ch == Top Front Center)
L, R, C, LFE, Ls, Rs, Cs, Oh
(Oh == Top Center)
L, R, C, LFE, Ls, Rs, Lh, Rh
(Lh == Top Front Left, Rh == Top Front Right)
Argh! |
Ls and
Rs (should/must) have the same meaning and position in a "normal" 5.1 configuration:
http://www.dts.com/Consumer_Electron...0743DB5CE.ashx
And from a "historical" POV, the config below is/should-be clearly
wrong:
http://www.dts.com/Consumer_Electron...2F50468B0.ashx
Anyway: the one to be blamed most is Microsoft. Because of Sony, they included the stupid SDDS channels in the WFextensible spec, and because of Dolby, they intend to transform rear channels into side channels.
