Doom9's Forum - View Single Post - .. excellent work on file size reduction with temp smoother ..

serbersan · 3rd January 2002, 18:27

...and I'm not sure the effect of smoother filter was so bad for 2 CD rips.

I've done a 2CD rip of Proof Of Life at 640x256 tempsmoother(1) and I'm very pleased, the overall quality is really great I doubt it could be so great without the filter. But it's only an opinion.

I'm doing 2 encodings of 2CD from "Dr. T." I want to see how the subjective is the opinion of doom9 about using lower resolution instead use a filter.

First 2 CD rip is 640x256 TempSmoother(1)
Second 2 CD rip is 608x240
Duration 1:55 min aprox || Audio 120Mbytes, 145kpbs VBR mp3 audio.

In the first rip without tempSmoother(1) compresibility was about 65% I think this value isn't enough for me. Obviously if it was something like 75% I wouldn't use any filter.

Well tonight I finish the 10hours First rip and tomorrow the second rip. If someone is interested I could attach images of both encondings, when they finish.

3rd January 2002, 18:27	#9 \| Link
serbersan Registered User Join Date: Oct 2001 Posts: 116	...and I'm not sure the effect of smoother filter was so bad for 2 CD rips. I've done a 2CD rip of Proof Of Life at 640x256 tempsmoother(1) and I'm very pleased, the overall quality is really great I doubt it could be so great without the filter. But it's only an opinion. I'm doing 2 encodings of 2CD from "Dr. T." I want to see how the subjective is the opinion of doom9 about using lower resolution instead use a filter. First 2 CD rip is 640x256 TempSmoother(1) Second 2 CD rip is 608x240 Duration 1:55 min aprox \|\| Audio 120Mbytes, 145kpbs VBR mp3 audio. In the first rip without tempSmoother(1) compresibility was about 65% I think this value isn't enough for me. Obviously if it was something like 75% I wouldn't use any filter. Well tonight I finish the 10hours First rip and tomorrow the second rip. If someone is interested I could attach images of both encondings, when they finish.