20th November 2010, 02:38
|
#10242
| Link
|
Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 20,976
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Priapismic
@jdobbs
Maybe in the next program version, and on post #1, you could do some re-phrasing that would avoid confusing newbies, et al:
The Matroska splitter is not mentioned in the actual program - instead being referred to as Haali splitter.
So if BDRB reports an incorrect Haali splitter during a failed encode, users will go looking for it in post #1 and not find it....
...maybe reword post #1 to include ..."Matroska", formerly known as...
anyway, thought it might help.
|
That works.
|
|
|