Ooops ... I found something on my HD:
Code:
function BlindDeHalo2( clip clp, float "rx", float "ry", int "strength", bool "interlaced" )
{
rx = default( rx, 3.00 )
ry = default( ry, 3.00 )
strength = default( strength, 125 )
interlaced = default( interlaced, false )
function m4(float x) {return(x<16?16:int(round(x/4.0))*4)}
i = interlaced==false ? clp : clp.separatefields()
oxi=i.width
oyi=i.height
mm2=yv12lutxy(i.expand().blur(.8).expand(),i.inpand.blur(.8).inpand(),yexpr="x y - 2 *")
RR=string((rx+ry)/2.0)
ST=string(float(strength)/100.0)
sm1= i.bicubicresize(m4(oxi/rx),m4(oyi/ry)).bicubicresize(oxi,oyi,1.0,.0)
sm1d=yv12lutxy(i,sm1,yexpr="x y - 18 "+ST+" / "+RR+" / / 128 +")
sm1d=overlay(sm1d,sm1d,mode="hardlight")
clean=yv12lutxy(i,sm1d,yexpr="x y 128 - -").mergechroma(i)
clean1=maskedmerge(i,clean,mm2.expand.blur(1.58).expand .levels(32,1.0,255,0,208,false))
interlaced?clean1.weave():clean1
return last
}
rx,ry [float] - the [assumed] radius at which the EE formerly was done
strength [int] - hmh, I forgot what this is for
- but I remember it should be between 0 and 200
interlaced [bool] - either for interlaced sources, or for progressive ones where the EE was applied on a field-basis, not on a frame-basis
A setting of (2.0,2.0,100) will do almost no harm even to a source that doesn't have any EE.
A setting of (3.25,3.25,150) should let vanish even very strong EE that was formerly applied at a radius of 3.
Don't forget the
MaskTools v1.5.5, in case anyone doesn't have them yet ...
Synthetic example:
