View Single Post
Old 26th July 2019, 15:37   #113  |  Link
Stereodude
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Region 0
Posts: 1,436
Quote:
Originally Posted by DJATOM View Post
So I've got 3900X onto my hands and we made an encoding speed comparison between it and 2x set of Xeon E5-2687W 0 (Jensen's setup)

SAO3 NCOP1 (full filtering script (AA, denoise, deband) + encode)
3900X: encoded 2208 frames in 0:18:21.28 (2.00 fps), 25531.44 kb/s, Avg QP:15.20
2687W x2: encoded 2208 frames in 0:32:32.68 (1.13 fps), 25506.87 kb/s, Avg QP:15.21

SAO3 NCOP1 (filtering script w/o AA part + encode)
3900X: encoded 2208 frames in 0:07:30.00 (4.91 fps), 26553.97 kb/s, Avg QP:14.98
2687W x2: encoded 2208 frames in 0:15:14.86 (2.41 fps), 26540.64 kb/s, Avg QP:14.99

I'm pretty satisfied with results. Now imagine that there are 16 core chips will come this autumn, it will be even faster.
Is that a first gen E5-2687W (not E5-2687Wv2)? What resolution and x265 preset is the data for?

So it's almost twice as fast as a dual processor E5-2687W system?
Stereodude is offline   Reply With Quote