Doom9's Forum - View Single Post - LAV Filters

turbojet · 17th February 2012, 08:42

The blocks are showing up when high-quality processing is enabled. Disabled they don't show on that sample, should one expect lower quality with it disabled when not deinterlacing?

The file size differences seem to depend on cuda. With it disabled LAVF is the same size as ffdshow, microsoft, and dgnv. Just did another short test and it's not always larger, lav-cuda was 8 KB smaller then the aforementioned decoders. The few times I've noticed different sizes with same x264 crf settings there's been an issue but this still looks fine.

One more thing, I was planning on using 64 bit for deinterlacing and 32 bit for ivtcing (or vice versa) but cuda deinterlaced output is not good for decimating and there's many missing/dupe frames but LAVF 32 and 64 bit properties are shared is there any chance to have them separated in a future version?

17th February 2012, 08:42	#9146 \| Link
turbojet Registered User Join Date: May 2008 Posts: 1,840	The blocks are showing up when high-quality processing is enabled. Disabled they don't show on that sample, should one expect lower quality with it disabled when not deinterlacing? The file size differences seem to depend on cuda. With it disabled LAVF is the same size as ffdshow, microsoft, and dgnv. Just did another short test and it's not always larger, lav-cuda was 8 KB smaller then the aforementioned decoders. The few times I've noticed different sizes with same x264 crf settings there's been an issue but this still looks fine. One more thing, I was planning on using 64 bit for deinterlacing and 32 bit for ivtcing (or vice versa) but cuda deinterlaced output is not good for decimating and there's many missing/dupe frames but LAVF 32 and 64 bit properties are shared is there any chance to have them separated in a future version? Last edited by turbojet; 17th February 2012 at 08:59.