Well, I think this is where the misunderstanding began. There's a post just below yours in that thread (by Mfa), which makes the ironic point that the document you linked was written over 10 years ago, but that people still weren't employing the techniques that are outlined in that document. Instead, they're still using blending, etc.
The way Mfa's message was written, however, it evidently was mis-interpreted by the poster as meaning that blending, etc. was part of the method outlined in that document-- which is not correct, if I'm understanding all this properly.
So I think that's how all of this confusion got started.
-Kevin
|