Quote:
Originally Posted by nevcairiel
But thats not true.
The performance requirements for scaling 1919x1079 to 1920x1080 is a lot higher then scaling 192x108 to 1920x1080
The more input pixels it has to read for scaling, the more taxing it will be.
|
So it is not true that scaling SD or 720p to 1080p instead of 1680x1050 is more taxing? This is not about a general rule, my posts were specifically directed to JarettH, who asked about performance requirements if you would scale to 1080p instead of 1680x1050. Please stop selectively taking apart my post by quoting only one sentence of it and as a result, quoting me completely out of context.
Quote:
Originally Posted by JarrettH
Mostly 720p. Standard definition stuff (720 x 400...ish) my rendering times were 12 ms lower.
I should have mentioned they are only being scaled up to 1680x1050. Does going to 1080p have a bigger impact? This isn't my home machine.
|