Doom9's Forum - View Single Post - MSU Video Codecs Comparison 2019

excellentswordfight · 20th February 2019, 10:19

As benwaggoner touched as well, 20fps for the UHD-test seems to be a far to high target, especially if the test platform is a consumer grade CPU. Somewere in the 1-5fps range seem far more reasonable, or at least have two UHD tests with different speed targets.

I also dont really see the ripping and ultra ripping use cases. If these are "ripps" with basically unrestricted vbv limits and GOP settings, this is a consumer scenario, cause I cant see any professional use case for this, and if its a consumer scenario, I dont see any point in going for settings that has such a big speed penilty that they become irrelevent for everything except for academic purpose, cause I dont see a huge market for "ripping" FHD at <1fps.

20th February 2019, 10:19	#5 \| Link
excellentswordfight Lost my old account :( Join Date: Jul 2017 Posts: 324	As benwaggoner touched as well, 20fps for the UHD-test seems to be a far to high target, especially if the test platform is a consumer grade CPU. Somewere in the 1-5fps range seem far more reasonable, or at least have two UHD tests with different speed targets. I also dont really see the ripping and ultra ripping use cases. If these are "ripps" with basically unrestricted vbv limits and GOP settings, this is a consumer scenario, cause I cant see any professional use case for this, and if its a consumer scenario, I dont see any point in going for settings that has such a big speed penilty that they become irrelevent for everything except for academic purpose, cause I dont see a huge market for "ripping" FHD at <1fps. Last edited by excellentswordfight; 20th February 2019 at 13:04.