Quote:
Originally Posted by benwaggoner
AFAIK it works by reducing signaling overhead without changing actual pixels.
|
There is a quite clear difference in the frame, it was quite obvious in this flat area (zoomed in though). The filesize difference was about 5% (the optimized version was smaller).
Without the optimization:
Optimization enabled:
In higher detailed area, the optimized encode looked better. I think I need to find a scene with some still background like sky, and see which one looks better in motion. The banding in flat areas can be quite eye-catching once you notice it.