Quote:
Originally Posted by madshi
I find NGU-AA to be not only more detailed, but it also has less ringing artifacts and looks more natural at the same time! I guess I should ask (in the madVR thread) once more if NNEDI3 is still needed/useful.
|
for me i never used NNEDI3 since NGU-AA come to madvr, NGU-AA looks more natural as you said and much faster in the same time
Quote:
|
Would be interesting to see how it would handle typical movie sources. Usually these types of algos are too slow for real time use, though.
|
yeah, it is too slow for real time use,i will traning the network soon if author did not put the pretraning moudel and i wish it give good result in typical movie sources.
Quote:
|
How does it compare to madVR's "remove compression artifacts"?
|
it is equal to madvr RCA-6 Values, but madvr also much much faster, i will up some comparison image soon.
edit:
All Images upscaling with NGU Sharp VH
jpg Source
https://postimg.org/image/pcaefvqfd/
madvr RCA6-high 1080p
https://postimg.org/image/qtvurl0cp/
letsenhance-anti-jpeg source
https://postimg.org/image/qv5skkewp/
letsenhance-anti-jpeg 1080p
https://postimg.org/image/ay70o19pl/
i think while (RCA*6) totally treat jpeg artifacts as efficiency as (letsenhance-anti-jpeg), but it is clear that (madvr-RCA) excel in save more sharpen and texture detail ��, With Note that (madvr- RCA) give this result in real time, though for now definitely (madvr-RCA) does best job than (letsenhance-anti-jpeg) since we do not have any control over letsenhance-anti-jpeg strength.(sorry if i miss understand your question right)