Doom9's Forum - View Single Post - eac3to

madshi · 29th January 2009, 17:03

@bigdog660, thanks for testing! You're doing:

(1) direct rip from BD drive.
(2) rip from virtual BD.

The one thing I'm really interested in is:

(3) rip from folder structure on harddisk.

I guess (3) might be more or less similar to (2), but I'm not sure. Probably (3) is the fastest of all options.

Edit: Actually (3) should be noticably different compared to (2) because eac3to v3.05 will see the virtual BD drive as a physical drive and thus use 2KB read blocks, while for (3) it will use 1MB read blocks instead.

29th January 2009, 17:03	#8073 \| Link
madshi Registered Developer Join Date: Sep 2006 Posts: 9,140	@bigdog660, thanks for testing! You're doing: (1) direct rip from BD drive. (2) rip from virtual BD. The one thing I'm really interested in is: (3) rip from folder structure on harddisk. I guess (3) might be more or less similar to (2), but I'm not sure. Probably (3) is the fastest of all options. Edit: Actually (3) should be noticably different compared to (2) because eac3to v3.05 will see the virtual BD drive as a physical drive and thus use 2KB read blocks, while for (3) it will use 1MB read blocks instead. Last edited by madshi; 29th January 2009 at 17:35.