Quote:
Originally Posted by IanB
No, that is a pseudo example of how you might be able to code it up in 2.6. Post 38 is an academically pure version for 2.5, given the trouble I had building a test pattern to actually see the error, I do not believe it is worthwhile.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by florinandrei
On my system (AMD Phenom 4 core 9850), the "pure" version is only a little bit slower than the "brute" one. It's 10.3 fps "pure" vs 12.7 fps "brute" when transcoding from 1080i AVCHD (MainConcept decoder via DirectShow) to 480i MPEG2 (HCenc encoder with max quality profile).
|
Er, which was the "brute" one I could use and not notice the difference ? 10.3->12.7 is significant enough for me.