|
@diogen
As I (completely) said earlier, if "Cinavia"/Verance watermarking is the end all and be all - and is contractually MANDATED with a price tag for what is essentially the Blu-ray "world", why would the studios (AACS LA members) be interested in this?
By "end all and be all", I'm referring to the purported invulnerability of the "Cinavia"/Verance watermarking system. If this was, in fact, the case, if I was a studio, I believe I could have no greater joy (regarding defeating piracy) than allowing unwitting (and "witting") pirates to copy my disc, only to find that they've made an unplayable copy - and I could then see no reason to add "old" or "new" BD+ to the equation...
|