View Single Post
Old 23rd June 2012, 20:26   #6  |  Link
CruNcher
Registered User
 
CruNcher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Germany
Posts: 4,926
The Speed is not the interesting thing the difference in Power Consumption is

i made a small test on that though these are in the wild shots not real scientific but i came to the following though this is also based on Nvidias old Shader Encoder not the new Kepler one and i came to the following result @ comparable quality on a 4 Core Intel SB system.

all Decoding CPU all overall system Power Consumption (out of the wall measurement) all using CABAC High Level 3.1

Quicksync (SB I5-2400 not S) = 110W
x264 (with some preset optimizations) = 130W (though im confident it could be lowered and would stilll look as good with some deeper source changes)
Nvidia 460 GTX (full/partial encoding) = 180W (full and partial encoding differ in the final visual result)

all reaching same Speed of around AVG 180 fps @ 720p 30 fps 3 mbit

though obviously more interesting it becomes the Higher the Bitrate gets and CABAC drives on
__________________
all my compares are riddles so please try to decipher them yourselves :)

It is about Time

Join the Revolution NOW before it is to Late !

http://forum.doom9.org/showthread.php?t=168004

Last edited by CruNcher; 24th June 2012 at 15:41.
CruNcher is offline   Reply With Quote