just a remark about treillis :
I tried several --crf 22 encodes with a couple of differing settings,
and re-did them all with treillis 1 enabled ... the filesize of the treillis version of each encode was always bigger, but I couldn't see any quality improvement (well ok it was bicubicresized 512*384 anime so It was a bit blurry, but still...).
Since someone said earlier that treillis allowed more compression of data I wanted to understand : why I could witness the opposite effect ?
A non exhaustive list of the settings I used :
CRF22, 6 bframes with bframe ratio = 1.6, RDO for Bframes and --subme 7, -minqp 20, --qcomp 0.7, CABAC enabled (obviously
), weighed biprediction, --bime, chromaQPoffset 4 ... the rest is pretty much the default settings.
Just one question :
- Should treillis be any more efficient in high/low motion scenes or does it simply not matter ?
Just trying to understand the "wierd" figures I've observed recently
