Kilyan
11th April 2005, 23:16
Hi!
I am using cce 2.67.00.27 with:
1) dvd2avi 1.76 by LOLI.J, modified by dvd2svcd 1.05 / Chatwalker 1.00
with MPEGDecoder.dll (both coming with dvd2dvdr professional 2.1.0)
OR
2) DGMPGDec 1.2.1 with DGDecode.dll (coming together)
Avisynth version 2.55 (but other versions too are installed, this was last)
I use the same settings for both Dvd2avi and DGMPGDec.
Source is PAL dvd, no matter which one.
Script for dvd2avi 1.76:
LoadPlugin("C:\Program Files\DVD2DVD-R Professional\MPEGDecoder\MPEGDecoder.dll")
MPEGSource("D:\Title.D2V")
ConvertToYUY2(Interlaced=False)
Script for DGMPGDec 1.2.1:
LoadPlugin("c:\DGMPGDec\dgdecode.dll")
mpeg2source("h:\Title.d2v")
ConvertToYUY2(Interlaced=False)
I get 2.2 at max speed in cce with dvdavi 1.76
I get 1.5 at max speed in cce with DGMPGDec 1.21
What makes the difference?
Is it better to use the DGMPGDec 1.21 for some reason? Does it give better picture or something else with slower speed?
Normally newer is faster/better no?
Is the dll which gives such a difference or the app itself?
Thanks for any reply
I am using cce 2.67.00.27 with:
1) dvd2avi 1.76 by LOLI.J, modified by dvd2svcd 1.05 / Chatwalker 1.00
with MPEGDecoder.dll (both coming with dvd2dvdr professional 2.1.0)
OR
2) DGMPGDec 1.2.1 with DGDecode.dll (coming together)
Avisynth version 2.55 (but other versions too are installed, this was last)
I use the same settings for both Dvd2avi and DGMPGDec.
Source is PAL dvd, no matter which one.
Script for dvd2avi 1.76:
LoadPlugin("C:\Program Files\DVD2DVD-R Professional\MPEGDecoder\MPEGDecoder.dll")
MPEGSource("D:\Title.D2V")
ConvertToYUY2(Interlaced=False)
Script for DGMPGDec 1.2.1:
LoadPlugin("c:\DGMPGDec\dgdecode.dll")
mpeg2source("h:\Title.d2v")
ConvertToYUY2(Interlaced=False)
I get 2.2 at max speed in cce with dvdavi 1.76
I get 1.5 at max speed in cce with DGMPGDec 1.21
What makes the difference?
Is it better to use the DGMPGDec 1.21 for some reason? Does it give better picture or something else with slower speed?
Normally newer is faster/better no?
Is the dll which gives such a difference or the app itself?
Thanks for any reply