nathanaa
17th February 2005, 05:53
I've been telling various people about how great DVD-RB is, and I just ran into a question I didn't know how to answer.
A friend of mine uses DVDShrink. I told her she should try DVD-RB. I mentioned something about how with ReJig she could just use that in place of DVDShrink, or use an actual encoder for her backups.
She asked me "If I'm just going to use the transcoder in DVD-RB why not just use DVDShrink then?"
I had no idea how to answer that! <lol@myself> Is there really any kind of quality or functional difference between using the ReJig transcoder with RB and just using DVDShrink? Or is the real benefit to RB the simplicity and high quality from using the encoders, and ReJig is just in there for the smaller backups where an encoder isn't really a requirement to keep high quality?
Thanks for any insight folks!
A friend of mine uses DVDShrink. I told her she should try DVD-RB. I mentioned something about how with ReJig she could just use that in place of DVDShrink, or use an actual encoder for her backups.
She asked me "If I'm just going to use the transcoder in DVD-RB why not just use DVDShrink then?"
I had no idea how to answer that! <lol@myself> Is there really any kind of quality or functional difference between using the ReJig transcoder with RB and just using DVDShrink? Or is the real benefit to RB the simplicity and high quality from using the encoders, and ReJig is just in there for the smaller backups where an encoder isn't really a requirement to keep high quality?
Thanks for any insight folks!