HDX4 screenshots

[CQ]

No comments! :D :D :D :D :D :D

http://img120.exs.cx/img120/9716/untitled37ph.jpg

[LordRPI]

Are you sure that Jomigo wants you to post these screenshots?

[CQ]

I guess its fine, there are only screenshots (without any other information).

[Leo 69]

Looks sweet...well the interface is quite nice for beginners :)
What is expected quality from this codec ? Is it at least better than XviD ?

[CQ]

Read the Doom9's 2004 CoDec Shootout.

[CruNcher]

They want money :P
from the dshow gui it still looks like the 1.3f version that comes with videojack

[IgorC]

Originally posted by Leo 69
Looks sweet...well the interface is quite nice for beginners :)
What is expected quality from this codec ? Is it at least better than XviD ?

hmmm AT LEAST better than Xvid? it´s not easy. Divx is trying to say that but .... it´s not easy since Xvid is the best MPEG4 ASP codec there is no chance to do somethng better

[Leo 69]

Can you explain me one thing, guys. Why bother releasing codec, which is not even as good as Xvid ? Who will use it ? :confused: At last, what are the overall advantages of HDX ?

Cheers

[MSlv]

Well, companys only use comercial codecs, so it's a good way to make some money. Right?

[Doom9]

Why bother releasing codec, which is not even as good as Xvid ?Why not think that question to the bitter end first? By your logic, a product should only be released if superior to everything else. Think about new foods, cars, electronic equipment, phones, and last but not least codecs for a bit. This year's Toyota Corolla is not better than an S class Mercedes.. so should Toyota not release it? Or in the codec world: DivX4 was better than DivX3.. so release it. SBC is better than DivX4 so release it. DivX5 is not better than SBC so don't release it. XviD, for a long time, was not better than SBC so don't release it. So, with your logic, you've just killed the probably best MPEG-4 ASP codec.

[Daniel_HDX4]

Originally posted by LordRPI
Are you sure that Jomigo wants you to post these screenshots?

No problem, these are only screenshots...

To all people here: Please note that this is no official release version!

Best regards,
Daniel

P.S.: Tijuana is a nice town. ;-)

[CQ]

Originally posted by Leo 69
Why bother releasing codec, which is not even as good as Xvid ?


Diversity. Competition means progres, better products. And remember HDX4 is at almost the first official version. So, in the future we can see a better than anything ASP codec (if the guys at Jomigo are workin' day and night :) )

Originally posted by Leo 69
Who will use it?


Don't you worry for that, let Jomigo :D .

[Leo 69]

Originally posted by Doom9
Why not think that question to the bitter end first? By your logic, a product should only be released if superior to everything else. Think about new foods, cars, electronic equipment, phones, and last but not least codecs for a bit. This year's Toyota Corolla is not better than an S class Mercedes.. so should Toyota not release it? Or in the codec world: DivX4 was better than DivX3.. so release it. SBC is better than DivX4 so release it. DivX5 is not better than SBC so don't release it. XviD, for a long time, was not better than SBC so don't release it. So, with your logic, you've just killed the probably best MPEG-4 ASP codec.

Oh, come on, I haven't killed anything.It's just my personal opinion and certainly I may be mistaken. :)
You could just say that HDX devs want to earn some money and that's all. I guess, by creating the HDX they didn't contribute too much to the codec world as XviD devs did. Remember AVC too. But still IMHO one
should first release a STUNNING codec and only then make it chargeable
but not to sell the old bicycle as in this case.Sorry

Originally posted by CQ

So, in the future we can see a better than anything ASP codec (if the guys at Jomigo are workin' day and night )

But we'll hope for that, of course :D

Cheers

[CQ]

CAN, no CAN'T :D .