PDA

View Full Version : 11 minutes with rejig, 18 hours with Quenc.


apfraats
8th January 2005, 19:33
Is this normal. Rejig being fast (even much faster then DVDshrink with HQ enabled), and Quenc much much slower ?

Anyone ?

Thx

PS: Rejig delivers poor results in my opinion. The compression was 52%, had a difficult DVD, where shrink did fail on quality totally, but Rejig doesn't do better.

jdobbs
8th January 2005, 19:46
ReJig uses the same type of "within the compressed domain" encoding as DVD Shrink, DVD2ONE, and DVD95Copy. There are limits to what can be done in that domain. No matter how much you analyze it, it requires a complete encode when the going gets tough.

QuEnc wouldn't normally take that long -- but enabling HQ mode and other options really slows it down. Try it some time without it. The difference isn't really that dramatic. If you want to improve the picture more effectively, AVISYNTH filters can do more. Try undot and deen on tough sources... (you'll need to download them).

On my system (Athlon 3200) QuEnc usually encodes at around 58-68 frames per second.

Rockas
8th January 2005, 21:14
Just a little "addon":

ReJig = Transcoder

QuEnc = Encoder

If you search a little on the forums you'll be able to find the difference.

apfraats
9th January 2005, 15:33
Originally posted by jdobbs
ReJig uses the same type of "within the compressed domain" encoding as DVD Shrink, DVD2ONE, and DVD95Copy. There are limits to what can be done in that domain. No matter how much you analyze it, it requires a complete encode when the going gets tough.

QuEnc wouldn't normally take that long -- but enabling HQ mode and other options really slows it down. Try it some time without it. The difference isn't really that dramatic. If you want to improve the picture more effectively, AVISYNTH filters can do more. Try undot and deen on tough sources... (you'll need to download them).

On my system (Athlon 3200) QuEnc usually encodes at around 58-68 frames per second.

On my system Athlon XP 3000+ I get about 30 Fps.
I wondering if 6you use Athlon 64 system ?
If not I wonder about factor 2 difference, can't be that extra 200 Mhz by the the Athlon.

And yes, indeed I enabled all Quality enhanched options.
Tonight I did the jon without extra quality options enabled and got 5-6 hours.

thx
Toine

jdobbs
9th January 2005, 16:22
No it's a standard Athlon XP 3200+. A lot can depend on the hard drive, as the more it gets fragmented the slower it will run. Internal memory can also be a factor (speed, not so much size) the PC3200 memory I use can handle a 200Mhz clock.

The numbers I gave are based upon an AVS with no additional filters installed. Filters can dramatically affect fps.