PDA

View Full Version : lossless for High Res ?


Bourla
1st August 2004, 13:07
I am looking for a lossless codec for high resolution (like 1600x1200 and more) animations (in RGB or RGBA format).
The decompression speed is the most important.
I would also like the source code to be available.

Any Idea ?


I have seen several lossless codecs referenced on this forum (CorePNG, ffv1, ...) but I have no idea (yet) of how they perform in term of decompression time ...

Tommy Carrot
1st August 2004, 13:15
I think huffyuv has the lowest cpu requirement for playback. If it's not fast enough, nothing else will be.

BTW, these lossless High Definition contents are eating up unbelievable data-rates, i don't think that the transfer speed of the hard-disk will be sufficient for the playback.

Sirber
1st August 2004, 15:49
I heard about a MPEG2 with iframes only for AVI. It might be the fastes lossless codec (for decoding). I can't find the URL :(

stephanV
1st August 2004, 16:01
i dont think MPEG2 I-frame only is lossless...

PowerMacG4
1st August 2004, 21:56
Originally posted by stephanV
i dont think MPEG2 I-frame only is lossless...

You are correct.

Sirber
1st August 2004, 22:40
Maybe that's why I can't find infos about it :D

superdump
2nd August 2004, 11:42
If you look toward the end of this thread (http://forum.doom9.org/showthread.php?s=&threadid=74669) it seems the Alparysoft encoder if very fast and may suit your needs in terms of encoding (it's lossless and it's apparently very fast with very good compression) so maybe it'll be good for decompression too.

Bourla
2nd August 2004, 18:19
Do you know anything comparing Alparysoft codec compared to FFv1 and to Huffyuv in term of decoding speed ? any benchmarch ?

By the way, Alparysoft is freeware and only available for Windows...

Tommy Carrot
2nd August 2004, 18:36
This thread made me a bit curious about this subject, and i did a few tests. I've got a bad news: a lossless high definition video can easily require 100 MB/sec, i don't think that outside the professional video-editing workstations there is any system which is sufficient for this. So the real problem is not the CPU, but the storage and bandwidth requirement.