PDA

View Full Version : Question on CCE , Scenarist


zamarky1
11th January 2004, 23:33
Hi All
Just wanted some info on CCE and Scenarist. Does everyone here use CCE SP cause its very expensive and sceanarist even more so. Maybe i am alot more underpaid then i thought but how on earth do you get those sorts of programs together in your tool box ? I have been following along reading lots of stuff i dont even understand on this board . I wanna play badly but am wondering if i am just wasting my time because there is no way i can afford these programs to backup my DVD's. Am i missing something ? i am thinkng maybe the "big three" dont need the original programs or something....


Any clues ? or do i save my pennies for another 200 years to join the club ;-)

Regards

Mark

Matthew
12th January 2004, 00:12
Many people here have Scenarist, CCE, Maestro, and many other pieces of expensive commercial software. How they obtained that software is no business of this place. They just have it.

zamarky1
12th January 2004, 01:52
Hi Matthew

Hmmmmm, i see. Would begging help. perhaps crying...but seriously i hear you. So where to from here. You know if anyone wanted to pm me i would love to chat, i know i am new and unknown and all but i'm a nice guy (no , really)

Dont know how to proceede from here. But thanks anyway , i do appreciate you taking the time to reply

Best Regards

Mark

OvERaCiD23
12th January 2004, 18:05
Matthew pretty much nailed it. We just so happen to have these programs and use them, and I'm sure we're all very glad we do have them. A little bit of creativity will allow you to have these programs as well, just don't ask us to aid your creativity on these forums. ;)

zamarky1
12th January 2004, 18:44
Hi All
Thanks OvERaCID23. I do indeed understand. I will not mention it again , i get the drift. Not sure of where the drift takes me , guess i need a "compass" to find my way through the woods, its a jungle out there. Bit off topic but i live out in the jungles of Africa and i am always worried about the ebola VIRUS ( hey i really do live in East Africa - but resting up in LONDON for a while). So i am scared of walking through the jungle on my own because the ebola thingy gets you when you least expect it much less when you poke your nose around in dark parts of the jungle you should't.

Anyway thanks for the comments. I have taken this onboard. can anybody see my email addy ? i guess i am not allowed to post it here right ? i sure dont want to talk any more on this here before i get in trouble.

Best Regards

mark (the jungle boy ?)

Beastie Boy
14th January 2004, 11:12
Peer2Peer file sharing networks are not discussed on this board.

Cheers, Beastie.

Doom9
14th January 2004, 13:22
@zamarky1: You are walking dangerously close to the rule6 abyss. No matter how you word it, this is not to place to get pirated software of any kind. Anything that would hint such things would go on here could have a very negative influence on the future existence of this place.

zamarky1
14th January 2004, 15:31
Hi Doom 9

Understand. Dont want to cause any problems. Sure was not my intent and i would hate to cause any stife for this wonderful forum.

Nuff said

Mark

Pfc Joker
15th January 2004, 05:15
Anything that would hint such things would go on here could have a very negative influence on the future existence of this place.
Not to beat a dead horse or anything but this quote really says it, so I hope that anyone thinking of posting in these forums, please, read doom9's rules before you do.

zamarky1
15th January 2004, 10:58
ahhh come on enough already !!

anybody else wanna come down and be all self rightous ...i would't mind looking through half the machines on this forum to see whats what...but who cares i dont.

Just for the record i never posted asking for anything other then how on earth do you guys get so many programs together. What i was getting at was i thought maybe the big three where coded in such a way that they did the job of the big progrmas referenced and as such there was no need to purchase CCE per se maybe there was some sort of run time or something ....i did't know hence asking.

Now turns out its some other way. So thats that. Its not my problem or care how any of you do things same as its not yours how i do mine. This is a forum for like minded people to come together and talk about stuff we all enjoy doing. I have had some really nice private messages explaining that as doom9 said i was skirting around a dangerous issue and dont go there which is fine. I have no problem with this and i respect the community within and their views and agree to abide by the rules as laidedown when you join. Thats all fine and enough has been said. O.K

What i do have a problem with is when its all been said and put to bed somneone wants to keep it alive. Why ? what for ? My thought is that people who have drilled far enough down into this section of this forum are fairly intelligent people on the cutting edge of the hobby. I think they have enough wit to understand what has been said and implied and the final outcome . Read the last two posts ! DOH !

So can we just leave it there now or is there anyone else who feels they need to say what has been said several times now ?

I really appreciate this forum , i think it is a wonderful place and since i found it its where i live on line just READING sometimes over and over taking things on board. I dont want to do anything that will jeopardise the place and so unfortunately i hinted that i wanted to understand some issues which are taboo here. But be honest most if not all of you have been there. I slipped o.k. I have gotten back up and will try harder to be a good community member.

I really do belive ENOUGH has been said. I cant see anything constructuive will come out of more people jumping on the bandwagon.

Best Regards

Mark

Pfc Joker
15th January 2004, 14:34
anybody else wanna come down and be all self rightous None of us are being self rightous, I personnaly just want to see the old cleche "Think before you open you mouth" exercised more.

Beastie Boy
15th January 2004, 14:47
I think Mark has apologised enough. Perhaps this thread should be closed.