Doom9
18th October 2003, 22:03
Ok guys, unfortunately I was away when the storm was still blowing and I'm having some PC issues so I've just gotten around to reading those threads. There are going to be some policy changes in the coming days, but before those are implemented, I want to talk them over with the moderator team.
Until then a few comments:
It was unfortunate that a tool that was under development and private testing got so much attention in a public place. I believe that if testing is private, so should the discussion about anything related to testing be. Posts where testers are raving about a program are all borderline to a rule5 violation, hence if anyone should feel the need to do so, they can use a private place.
I did approve MX' announcement of DVDStripper. I knew with the hype prior to the release it wouldn't be the best thing, but someone would've announced it anyway, and if there hadn't been any previous hyping I don't think the announcement would've been a problem.
I have removed all the locked posts on the dvdstripper subject. If you have any problems with registration, or want to express your ethical or moral impression of that program, please use the official forum (http://www.dvdrbase.com/forumdisplay.php?f=177) because that's not the stuff we discuss here. If you feel the need to share your success stories, do also use the official forum because unless you are explicitly asked, you must not use our bandwidth to say how something works for you. If you have any ideas how the program can be used creatively to achieve something special, then that's the place (just like you could discuss registry hacks for IC7/8 to make the program more useful). Let's focus on being creative and pushing the envelope, not on bashing each other's heads in.
I'll continue this after we've had the chance to talk this over internally.
As a last note, let me just remind you of forum rule 16. If you go against what I'm asking for in this post, you'll be eligible for a rule16 strike even if you have not violated any "traditional" rule.
Until then a few comments:
It was unfortunate that a tool that was under development and private testing got so much attention in a public place. I believe that if testing is private, so should the discussion about anything related to testing be. Posts where testers are raving about a program are all borderline to a rule5 violation, hence if anyone should feel the need to do so, they can use a private place.
I did approve MX' announcement of DVDStripper. I knew with the hype prior to the release it wouldn't be the best thing, but someone would've announced it anyway, and if there hadn't been any previous hyping I don't think the announcement would've been a problem.
I have removed all the locked posts on the dvdstripper subject. If you have any problems with registration, or want to express your ethical or moral impression of that program, please use the official forum (http://www.dvdrbase.com/forumdisplay.php?f=177) because that's not the stuff we discuss here. If you feel the need to share your success stories, do also use the official forum because unless you are explicitly asked, you must not use our bandwidth to say how something works for you. If you have any ideas how the program can be used creatively to achieve something special, then that's the place (just like you could discuss registry hacks for IC7/8 to make the program more useful). Let's focus on being creative and pushing the envelope, not on bashing each other's heads in.
I'll continue this after we've had the chance to talk this over internally.
As a last note, let me just remind you of forum rule 16. If you go against what I'm asking for in this post, you'll be eligible for a rule16 strike even if you have not violated any "traditional" rule.