Brazil
8th October 2003, 21:18
Hello all,
Just a quick question and I am sure that the answer is a fairly subjective one but I would like to know at what point increasing the bitrate for an avi using Divx 5.1 becomes worthless. I sometimes fill up one DVD-R with a single film with a bitrate of about 2300. This film was the first Lord of the Rings. The quality is obvioulsy amazing. I dont set the bitrate myself I just decide the file size of the avi though GKnot. So is there a point where simply increasing the avi file size and therefore the bitrate becomes a waste of time with no noticeable visual improvement?
The reason why I ask is because I bought an Archos AV320 (which never seems to get a mention on this site although it really is a great portable Divx player) and that one of the latest rips I did which has a 2433kb bitrate film at 608x480 has a little difficulty keeping the sound and video in sync due to the large bitrate.
Thanks for any responses,
Ben.
Just a quick question and I am sure that the answer is a fairly subjective one but I would like to know at what point increasing the bitrate for an avi using Divx 5.1 becomes worthless. I sometimes fill up one DVD-R with a single film with a bitrate of about 2300. This film was the first Lord of the Rings. The quality is obvioulsy amazing. I dont set the bitrate myself I just decide the file size of the avi though GKnot. So is there a point where simply increasing the avi file size and therefore the bitrate becomes a waste of time with no noticeable visual improvement?
The reason why I ask is because I bought an Archos AV320 (which never seems to get a mention on this site although it really is a great portable Divx player) and that one of the latest rips I did which has a 2433kb bitrate film at 608x480 has a little difficulty keeping the sound and video in sync due to the large bitrate.
Thanks for any responses,
Ben.